Since 1997 | Your Pittsburgh Law Firm
Your Pittsburgh Law Firm
December 7, 2011

Pittsburgh Set to Mail 2012 Assessments; County to Raise Millage Rate

📚 Historical article. This post reflects the law and County procedures when it was written. Deadlines, the Common Level Ratio and hearing rules have changed, and a new countywide reassessment has been ordered.

Read the current 2027 Tax Appeal Guide →Reassessment Guide →

Originally published December 7, 2011. Updated October 2026.

In December 2011, Allegheny County announced that the first 2012 reassessment notices would be mailed on December 19, 2011, to all commercial and residential property owners in the City of Pittsburgh. This article describes what was happening at the time.

Why the City Went First

The court ordered the County to release City of Pittsburgh reassessments before January 1, 2012, so the City and Pittsburgh Public Schools could set their 2012 millage rates. Both operate on a calendar year. Most other school districts and municipalities use a fiscal year running from July to June or similar. The rest of the County would follow later.

Appeal Deadlines Not Yet Set

As of December 7, 2011, the appeal deadline for City properties had not been set. In past years, the deadline had consistently been March 31. There was speculation that 2012 deadlines would be shorter, so we urged owners to watch closely for notices from the Office of Property Assessments.

A Higher County Millage Rate

The County approved an increase in its millage rate from 4.69 mills to 5.69 mills. That meant:

  • A property assessed at $100,000 would owe $569 in County tax instead of $469.
  • A property assessed at $500,000 would owe $2,845 instead of $2,345.

Some had hoped rates would fall as assessments rose. Instead, many owners faced a double hit: higher values and a higher rate.

The “5% Cap”

Many clients asked about a 5% cap on revenue increases after a reassessment. As we explained at the time, the rule limited a taxing body’s increase in total revenue, not just property tax revenue. Some taxing bodies argued that expected losses elsewhere, such as lower delinquent collections, kept total revenue within the limit even as property tax revenue rose. We expected many to keep rates high out of concern about appeals.

What This Means for You Today

Talk to Us

Call 412-802-6666, text 412-855-5511, or send us a message for a free consultation.

Noah P. Fardo, Esq.

Managing Partner · Trial Lawyer

Noah Fardo is a Pittsburgh medical malpractice and personal injury trial lawyer who has represented injured patients, accident victims and their families since 1999.

Tags

No items found.

Related Practice Area

Related Services

No items found.

Request a Free Consultation

Shawn T. Flaherty, Esq., founding partner, Flaherty Fardo Rogel & Amick
Shawn T. Flaherty, Esq.
Founding Partner | Personal Injury & Truck Accident Attorney
Thank you for your submission. We try to respond promptly, often within hours. If you need immediate assistance, you can try texting 412.855.5511. Be in touch shortly.

Thank you,
‍Noah Paul Fardo
Managing Partner
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.